top of page

Patrick Strawbridge and Erin Wilcox: Legal Perspectives on Equal Education

Written by CAPA-JRC reporters Jessica Zhang and Emily Jia


On June 29, 2024, the Asian American Coalition for Education (AACE) held the 2nd National Conference on Equal Education Rights, celebrating the one year anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court rulings on SFFA v. Harvard and UNC cases. Among the speakers were Patrick Strawbridge, the lawyer in the SFFA case, and Erin Wilcox, an attorney a part of the Pacific Legal Foundation.

The main job that Wilcox does with the Pacific Legal Foundation is to help litigate equal protection cases pertaining to K-12 schools. She described how the Supreme Court ruled in the SFFA v. Harvard and UNC cases help in her cases related towards K-12 schools. “[The Supreme Court cases] solidified in what instances schools can use race as a factor,” Wilcox said.

       Lawyer Patrick Strawbridge, describes the prior precedent of allowing affirmative action as “a fig leaf behind which universities could do whatever they wanted in terms of racial discrimination, and claim they were in compliance with the law.” Strawbridge and other members of the legal team had to delve into the behind-the-scenes of Harvard and UNC admissions processes, in which they discovered “how badly they were disadvantaging students of Asian-American descent.”

Based on his personal beliefs on the concept of affirmative action, Strawbridge elaborates, “I think it’s a matter of fairness that we do not treat individuals as representative of their skin color or ethnic background. I think American history has shown that there is no such thing as an appropriate or minor use of race, as race is an inherently pernicious category.”

Wilcox believes that the Supreme Court ruling on the case had a significant impact in the fight for equal education rights. “It’s a really big deal because it solidified in what instances the government can use race as a factor. The decision last year said, ‘Hey wait a minute, this is too important, you don’t just get to treat people differently based on race,” Wilcox said. She also believes that not only did the decision have an impact on colleges, but it also had a big impact on schools and employment. 

However, Strawbridge notes that the results and impacts of the ruling are still uncertain: “What’s going to happen in college admissions remains to be seen, as we don’t have all the statistics on how admissions processes will change.” 

JRC members are grateful to have heard legal perspectives from both of these notable figures, as well as their stories and personal beliefs on the proper road towards equal education. 


This article was provided by Chinese American Parents Association Junior Reporter Club (CAPA JRC) with members who interviewed, audio recorded, wrote, translated, and video recorded. CAPA JRC has 25 Montgomery County middle to high school students. They have created a bilingual platform delivering news and serving the community.

Instagram: @capa_jrc


Recent Posts

See All

Patrick Strawbridge和Erin Wilcox: 平等教育的法律人士

作者:Jessica Zhang和Emily Jia 美国亚裔教育联盟(AACE)于2024年6月29号召开了第二届全国平等教育权益大会, 庆祝美国最高法院关于对学生公平招生团体状告哈佛案的裁决(SFFA v. Harvard)胜诉一周年。主讲人分别为SFFA提案的律师P...

面谈和崔本涛

作者:Angie Shen 崔本涛是波士顿家长学术成功联盟(BPCAE)的主席,是一位坚定的基于功绩的教育倡导者。拥有创业和政治活动的背景,崔本涛已成为教育改革的重要倡导者。他致力于维护基于功绩的教育,确保所有学生都能获得无意识形态偏见的优质教育。崔本涛在波士顿有三个孩子...

面谈和范希

作者:Angie Shen 范希( Xi Van Fleet )是一位华裔美国作家、演讲者和政治活动家,以其对马克思主义的直言不讳的批评和对美国宪法原则的倡导而闻名。她出生在中国,亲身经历了文化大革命,这对她对共产主义和威权主义的看法产生了深远影响。她目前对美国教育体系的...

Comments


bottom of page